"The adherence of most of the scientific, as well as the medical,
establishment to an essentially atheistic outlook, is an absolutely necessary
foundation of modern medical ethics that allows a host of practices, including
abortion, in vitro fertilization, cloning and embryo research, that are
abhorrent to believers in the Judeo/Christian God. High level de-populationists
and eugenicists within and without the Catholic Church are also believers in
Darwinian ideology as giving credibility to their dark schemes against the
sanctity and divinely ordered nature of human life."
Vatican
Astronomer Contradicts Cardinal’s Support of Catholic Teaching on
Evolution
Darwinian
foundation to today’s scientific and medical ethics, de-populationists,
eugenicists
ROME, August 9, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In recent weeks, a highly placed
Vatican Cardinal rattled the liberal media establishment by making statements to
the effect that the Church cannot accept an essentially atheistic understanding
of evolution. Christoph Cardinal Schonborn wrote in the New York Times that the
neo-Darwinian understanding of evolution, that of random mutations and
development of species, is incompatible with belief in the Christian God.
Now the UK’s liberal Catholic magazine, the Tablet, has run an article by a
priest astronomer, the director of the Vatican Observatory, who takes Schonborn
to task for his defence of the Catholic understanding of who God is. George
Coyne, a liberal Jesuit, has attempted to refute Schonborn and in doing so, has
revealed the foundational bias of his – and the media’s – secularist mindset.
In his article, Schonborn wrote that the “defenders of neo-Darwinian dogma
have often invoked the supposed acceptance - or at least acquiescence - of the
Roman Catholic Church when they defend their theory as somehow compatible with
Christian faith.”
The mainstream media and the overwhelmingly secularist scientific community
responded with howls of outrage. Particularly vexing to them was the Cardinal’s
refutation of the popular misconception that in 1996, John Paul II had changed
the Church’s stand to allow for Darwin’s theory that mere chance, not God,
guides the development of life.
Schonborn said the “defenders of neo-Darwinian dogma have often invoked the
supposed acceptance - or at least acquiescence - of the Roman Catholic Church
when they defend their theory as somehow compatible with Christian faith.”
“This,” the Cardinal says bluntly, “is not true.”
Coyne writes in the Tablet, that John Paul’s statement was “epoch making” in
which, Coyne claims, John Paul declared to the the Pontifical Academy of
Sciences that “evolution is no longer a mere hypothesis.” He claims that it
ended the Church’s argument against the atheistic and secularist philosophies of
science.
The news that the Vatican’s astronomer has claimed that the Church accepts
“the principle of chance” in the development of life has made headlines all over
a mainstream media (MSM) that is dedicated to establishing secularist ethics.
The MSM pounced on the dispute as an example of the Catholic Church’s hostility
to rationality and science; one of the oldest and most popular anti-Catholic
canards.
In the online edition of the Independent, the gleefully hopeful headline
runs, “Evolution Dispute Now Set to Split Catholic Hierarchy.” The Independent’s
Michael McCarthy called it a “conflict at the highest level of the Catholic
Church,” and said that Cardinal Schonborn’s remarks had “provoked alarm among
many scientists and liberal Catholics around the world.”
This “split,” however, exists mostly in the fond imaginings of the media. An
objective observer can see that the argument of a secularized American Jesuit in
favour of the prevailing atheism and against the existence of God and an ordered
universe is unlikely to be taken with much seriousness within Catholic
hierarchical circles.
Michael McCarthy implies that there is further evidence that the liberal
establishment’s worst fears about the election of the “hardliner” Ratzinger to
the papacy are about to come true. He writes, “Some fear that the cardinal would
never have published such a controversial article in such a prominent medium
without his personal approval. But nothing will be known for certain until the
Pope speaks for himself.”
But Benedict has already addressed the issue as Pope prominently mentioning
it in his homily at his inaugural Mass. He said, “We are not some casual and
meaningless product of evolution. Each of us is the result of a thought of God.
Each of us is willed, each of us is loved, each of us is necessary.”
The adherence of most of the scientific, as well as the medical,
establishment to an essentially atheistic outlook, is an absolutely necessary
foundation of modern medical ethics that allows a host of practices, including
abortion, in vitro fertilization, cloning and embryo research, that are
abhorrent to believers in the Judeo/Christian God. High level de-populationists
and eugenicists within and without the Catholic Church are also believers in
Darwinian ideology as giving credibility to their dark schemes against the
sanctity and divinely ordered nature of human life.
The eagerness with which the MSM supports and promotes internal dissent
within the Catholic Church is a testament to the credibility of traditional
Christian teaching on the meaning, purpose and worth of every human being and
the danger this teaching poses to the media’s aggressively secularized
worldview.
Read George Coyne’s article in the Tablet:
“Evolution Dispute Now Set to Split Catholic Hierarchy”
Darwinian Evolution Incompatible with
Catholic Faith says Cardinal and Author of Catholic Catechism